The AI Education Divide: Singapore's Upskilling Boom Meets Norway's Classroom Ban
Photo by Google DeepMind on Pexels
The AI Education Divide: Singapore's Upskilling Boom Meets Norway's Classroom Ban
Singapore's SkillsFuture courses are overflowing with professionals racing to learn AI. At Heicoders Academy, generative AI programs now account for 80% of revenue, with profits doubling year after year. Info-Tech Academy saw enrolments surge 2,070% in 2025, and another 514% in Q1 2026 alone. "AI" tops the MySkillsFuture search rankings. This is the Singapore story — a nation betting big on AI upskilling.
But halfway across the world, Norway is moving in the opposite direction.
On June 19, Prime Minister Jonas Gahr Store announced a near-total ban on generative AI for primary school students aged 6 to 13. From August, Norwegian children will largely learn without AI tools. The reasoning: "The most important thing in school is that our children learn to read, write and do mathematics."
These two headlines — published within days of each other — highlight a growing global divide over AI in education and the workplace. For Singapore professionals trying to figure out their own AI strategy, both stories carry important lessons.
Singapore's AI Fever: The Numbers Behind the Boom
The scale of Singapore's AI upskilling push is remarkable. According to a report from The Straits Times, the surge in course enrolments that began with the 2025 SkillsFuture Credit top-up expiry has proven to be a sustained boom, not a temporary spike.
Heicoders Academy CEO Min Yan reported that generative AI programmes now account for roughly 80% of the academy's revenue, with profit from AI courses growing about 100% year on year for three consecutive years. More than 3,000 learners have enrolled in its AI-related programmes in 2026 alone. Most are working professionals — 60% sponsored by their employers, 30% self-funded professionals and business owners, and 10% fresh graduates and job seekers.
Info-Tech Academy's numbers are even more striking. After a 2,070% enrolment surge in 2025, demand continued climbing — 514% growth from Q1 2025 to Q1 2026. The academy expanded from a single generative AI productivity course to five offerings covering everything from ChatGPT basics to AI for business management.
The Association of Chartered Certified Accountants (ACCA) reports similar momentum. Attendance at its AI-related events in Singapore grew 12% between 2023 and 2025. Its Global Talent Trends 2026 report found that AI literacy has become a "core professional development priority" for finance professionals.
Even grassroots Singapore is getting in on the action. At the Tampines AI Exhibition 2026, Temasek Polytechnic students showcased "Luna" — a voice AI assistant powered by Singapore's SEA-LION model that helps seniors navigate smartphone apps, switching between English, Mandarin, Malay, Tamil, and Singlish. Minister Masagos Zulkifli, the guest of honour, framed the effort as a national necessity: "The familiarity and confidence in using AI is a first step, before we can talk about what else a Singaporean can do as a worker."
Norway's Counter-Narrative: Why Playgrounds Trump Prompts
Norway's near-ban on AI in primary education stands in stark contrast. The country — which was an early adopter of computers in classrooms back in the 1990s and tablets after 2010 — is now reversing course.
The ban applies to students from first to seventh grade (ages 6 to 13), who should "as a general rule not be using AI." Students aged 14 to 16 can cautiously adopt AI tools under teacher supervision. Only those aged 17 to 19 will learn to use AI appropriately, to prepare for higher education and work.
This isn't an isolated move. Norway banned smartphones from schools in 2024 after declining education test scores. The government is also proposing legislation to fund more physical books in classrooms, reversing the tablet-first trend. And it plans to ban social media for children under 16, following Australia's lead.
The message from Oslo is clear: foundational skills — reading, writing, mathematics — come before AI fluency. There's a growing concern that introducing generative AI too early risks students bypassing critical cognitive development steps.
The Hidden Cost of AI Adoption: Burnout and Workload Creep
Beyond the education debate, another challenge is emerging for working professionals. The promise that AI would free us from busywork and create more leisure time hasn't materialised for many.
A study of 136,000 US workers published on the Social Science Research Network found that those in AI-exposed jobs logged an average of 3.4 additional hours per week, with leisure time declining. An eight-month study published in Harvard Business Review of 200 employees at a US technology company identified "workload creep" — AI enabled workers to take on more tasks and work across more hours. Translators increasingly edit AI-generated output rather than translating from scratch. Software developers review more machine-written code. The work hasn't disappeared; it has shifted from creation to supervision.
As one executive told The Straits Times: "Sometimes, I wonder why I bother going to work at all." The anxiety wasn't about workload in the conventional sense — it was about uncertainty over the value of human contribution in an AI-augmented workplace.
This matters for Singapore's upskilling push. AI literacy is clearly valuable — but so is understanding where to draw the line. The professionals who benefit most from AI are likely those who use it strategically to augment specific tasks, not those who try to do everything faster.
What This Means for Singapore Professionals
Three lessons emerge from these contrasting stories:
Upskill strategically, not frantically. The SkillsFuture boom is real and the opportunity is significant. But as the burnout research shows, learning to use AI effectively isn't just about speed — it's about knowing when not to use it. The best AI practitioners maintain their core expertise and use AI as a force multiplier, not a replacement.
AI literacy is becoming table stakes. ACCA's data makes this clear — across industries, employers are increasingly expecting AI capabilities. Singapore's national AI missions in manufacturing, finance, healthcare, and logistics mean that AI adoption will accelerate, not slow down. Professionals who invest in AI skills now are positioning themselves for the next decade.
Maintain perspective on the global debate. Norway's approach reflects real concerns about cognitive development and screen dependency. While Singapore's strategy of starting AI exposure at the community level (rather than in primary classrooms) strikes a sensible middle ground, the Norwegian caution is worth noting — especially for parents considering their children's relationship with AI tools.
Your Next Step
If you're a Singapore professional thinking about AI upskilling, here's a practical starting point: log into MySkillsFuture, search for AI courses in your industry, and use your SkillsFuture credits to try one. The fees after subsidies are typically $600 to $1,000 — a small investment for an increasingly essential capability. Pair this with a deliberate practice of protecting your deep work time, and you'll capture the upside of AI adoption without falling into the burnout trap.
Singapore's approach may differ from Norway's, but the underlying question is the same: how do we harness AI's potential without losing the human skills that make us effective? The answer, for now, lies in thoughtful adoption — learning fast, but not so fast that we forget what makes learning worthwhile in the first place.
Sources: The Straits Times (June 2026), Reuters (June 19, 2026), SSRN study (2026), Harvard Business Review (February 2026), ACCA Global Talent Trends 2026



